Movies, movies, movies. They make good fodder for opinions. I never knew I had so many opinions about movies, and about all kinds of things for that matter, till I started writing this blog. Now I can’t shut myself up. When I retire from blogging I plan to go back to my former ways, which involved a vow of near-silence and rigorous mental training to keep opinions at an unmeasurably low level. For now, though, here we go again:
My wife Sandy and I caught two movies, their themes heavily musical, in suburban Philadelphia on a recent weekend. First we saw Sing Street. The next day it was Miles Ahead. Sing Street came with a three and a half star rating from The Philadelphia Inquirer. I took a look at The Inquirer’s 50-word summary of the movie and at some words of praise quoted in the film’s newspaper advertisement, and I was sold. I mean, here was a story, set in 1985, about an Irish lad infatuated with the idea of forming a rock and roll band, and also infatuated with a girl. Undoubtedly it would be a charmer. Count me in.
Turns out that Sing Street ain’t da bomb. Very surprising, since John Carney, its director and author, previously turned out way solid fare with two music-infused films, both of which he also wrote and directed. Is there anybody who didn’t like Once, the lower-than-low budget love story from 2007 that brought the world to tears with dazzlingly tender songs such as Falling Slowly? And what was there to dislike about Carney’s 2013 opus Begin Again? It starred Keira Knightley and Mark Ruffalo, and it did nothing but snap, crackle and pop.
Now, Sing Street isn’t the worst. It’s watchable. It’s pleasant. But halfway through I began scratching my head, wondering if I was viewing the same flick that the Inquirer’s reviewer had fawned over. Admittedly, on paper the set-up seems good: Fifteen-year-old Conor, a nice, directionless kid, is living in Dublin with his sister and older brother and squabbling parents. He is introduced to emotive, big hair 1980s rock and roll (The Cure, Duran Duran) by his slacker brother. Then he meets a cute 16-year-old girl who knocks his socks off, and decides to become a musician and put together a rock band to impress said girl. Conor, natch, will be the band’s big-haired lead singer. So, what’s my gripe? In two words, sloppy screenplay.
Example number one: This is a movie partly about a boy and his band, yet only one of Conor’s four bandmates gets to do much yapping. Whatever personalities the three others possess are pretty invisible. Collectively those three lads recite maybe 60 words during the movie.
Number two: Family-wise, the movie delves only into Conor’s relationship, which is strong, with big brother Jack. But Conor seems to get along pretty nicely with the other family members. Which is why I was lost at sea when Conor, permanently leaving the parental household near the end of the film, directs moving words toward his mother but not a syllable toward good ol’ Dad or Sis.
That’s enough examples. Hey, sometimes you lose. But sometimes you win, and I can’t say enough good things about Miles Ahead. This is a most unorthodox and highly creative take on Miles Davis, the superb jazz musician whose aura blanketed the globe for over 40 years. Miles was a force musically and sartorially, and set the standard, if you can call it that, for hipster cool. He was a singular talent, a complicated guy, multisided. Not everybody he knew necessarily saw the same sides. And he was a prolific and hardworking musician, recording many dozens of albums as a leader, starting in 1951. His final studio sessions took place in 1991, the year he died at age 65.
A strange thing happened, though, during the second half of Miles’ career. Due to health problems and drug addictions and who-knows-what-else, he went into near-seclusion in 1975, holing himself up in his Upper West Side townhouse in Manhattan. And for the next several years apparently he didn’t do much of anything worth noting. Eventually he felt the urge to make new music, and returned to the recording studio in 1980. The next year he began to tour again. But what was life like for Miles during his period of withdrawal from public life? What was going on inside his head? Those are the questions that Miles Ahead grabs hold of. Fantasizing some answers, the movie takes the audience on a wild ride.
Miles Ahead is Don Cheadle’s baby. He plays Miles in the movie. He looks a lot like him, nails the raspy voice, and constructs a cinematic Miles so natural and believable I have a feeling that he comes damn close to the real thing’s personality. Not only that, Cheadle directed the movie — to me, flawlessly — and co-wrote the screenplay. Yeah, you bet this guy is talented.

During his self-imposed confinement, was music ever far from Miles’ mind? Probably not, though he had hit a huge creative roadblock. The movie opens in 1979 or so, in Miles’ spacious and disheveled home, where he has yet to come out of his lengthy funk. And where he dwells on the past, on the music he had made. In flashback scenes throughout the film, covering the late 1950s through about 1966, we see Miles at work. And in love. That was a fecund musical period for Miles, and during it he was head over heels for Frances Taylor, a professional dancer who married (and divorced) him and helped inspire him. Seamlessly blended with the past is an invented scenario in which 1979’s Miles becomes involved in a loopy caper that has some good results: It gets him out of his house and ultimately leads him to reclaim his misplaced musical mojo. His semi-trusted companion in the adventure is a music journalist (done just right by Ewan McGregor) who has edges as flinty and unpredictable as Miles himself. And that is why Miles comes to like him.
I won’t say more about the plot. What I’m wondering, though, is if a viewer needs to be a Miles Davis fan to enjoy this movie. Me, I’m a big fan. But I think I’d have loved the movie even if I weren’t. It seems so real. It breathes like Miles Davis trumpet solos . . . on the trumpet, Miles might dartingly probe the outer planets of the solar system, or might ruminate bittersweetly. And it’s the opposite of the standard biopic in more ways than its fantastical caper. After all, it entirely skips about 55 years of Miles’ life. If Miles, a forward thinker, were alive to view the flick, no doubt he’d say something like this to Don Cheadle: “Man, I don’t know how you came up with this crazy plot, but it slays me. Motherf**ker, that’s me up there on the screen.”
(Don’t be shy about adding your comments, or about sharing this article with others)
I will skip Sing and see Miles. Usually your reviews are right on!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miles Ahead is one of my favorite movies so far in 2016.
LikeLike
Keira Knightley and Mark Ruffalo—two reasons I liked Begin Again. But I don’t know about Sing Street. I have rock musicians in my family, and have seen the angst up close, so I’ll pass. But I love Miles Davis, and will try to see this. So sad that he died at 65!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miles is one of my very favorite jazz musicians. I got to see him only once. It was in the 1980s. I wish I had seen him in the 1960s, when he had Wayne Shorter et al in his group.
LikeLike
Miles by a mile.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you are a big Miles fan, I’m pretty sure that you’ll love Miles Ahead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, I didn’t like “Once”… but, after that excellently constructed view of Miles Ahead, I’m really looking forward to seeing it later in the week. I wondered the same when I saw an early screening of Inside Llewyn Davis, would anyone unaware of what happened in Greenwich Village in 1962 really enjoy the film, but it seems that lots of people did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Inside Llewyn Davis was such a good movie. I’m glad that it found an audience.
LikeLike
So now I have another must-see movie on my high-priority list of, currently 12 titles. Most of them your fault.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guilty!
LikeLike
Given the price of cinema tickets in London, I think I’ll wait for both become available on demand. Nice review though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Both probably will be on demand pretty soon. I don’t think they are big hits at the theaters (not in the USA, anyway).
LikeLiked by 1 person
3 tickets is about $70 in London. It means that going speculatively to the cinema is a high stakes gamble. Out of curiosity, how much would 3 tickets in Philly be?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ouch! London is expensive.
In Philadelphia, tickets would range from $9 to $13 per person, depending on the time of day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Especially painful when films are available for “free” on Netflix or Amazon 4 months later
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great reviews. I’ll avoid “Sing Street.” It sounds similar to “The Commitments,” from 1991, about a Dublin kid who forms an R&B band, but which was a very good film (IMHO). I love ’50s-era Miles Davis, and I thought Don Cheadle was great in “Hotel Rwanda” and “Boogie Nights,” so I’ll add “Miles Ahead” to my list… thanks!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cheadle is a terrific actor. I think you’ll like Miles Ahead. If not, please don’t come after me!
LikeLike
I recently watched “Sing Street,” and I enjoyed it mainly for personal reasons. The best part of the movie is the relationship between Conor and his older brother. Their relationship is very similar to the one I have with my older brother. I credit him for introducing me to tons of great new music while I was growing up. He still does today. I haven’t seen “Miles Ahead,” but will definitely check it out!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Lori. I’m with you – – – the relationship between Conor and his brother was the best part of Sing Street. Thanks for reading this article and for adding your personal touches.
LikeLiked by 1 person